Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
Anker 335
vs
Anker 735 Nano 2:
117 Highlights & 23 Differences —
So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
Learn about efficiency, heat management, and durability for your next charger.
What sets Anker 335 apart from Anker 735 Nano 2? This chargers face-off compares specs like usb-c ports, wireless charging power, width & height and beyond.
Plug Insertion Cycles: High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
with 2 points higher
Anker 335 vs Anker 735 Nano 2: A Detailed Charging Companion Comparison
If you're in the market for a versatile, beginner-friendly charger that supports multiple devices, both the Anker 335 and the Anker 735 Nano 2 are strong contenders designed primarily for indoor use. These compact chargers share several core features, such as three-port output (2 USB-C and 1 USB-A), high heat management efficiency using passive thermal dissipation, and universal compatibility with laptops and tablets across brands.
Each unit emphasizes safety with multi-layer safety redundancy, fire protection, and thermal fail-safe modes, accompanied by generous 1.5-year warranties and responsive customer support channels. Their premium build quality and travel-friendliness cater perfectly to everyday needs while maintaining environmentally mindful material sustainability ratings. However, the two diverge notably in charging technology, output capabilities, and durability, which influence user experience and device protection.
Power Meets Practicality: The Anker 335 Advantage
The Anker 335 adopts a standard charging approach that delivers up to a robust 67W maximum and peak output power, making it slightly more powerful than its GaN rival. Its dynamic power distribution method intelligently adapts power across the connected devices, optimizing charging speed for varied combinations of tablets, laptops, and smartphones. Ideal for those juggling multiple gadgets simultaneously, this feature ensures efficient energy allocation. While the Anker 335 doesn't specify output voltage, it compensates by supporting Qi wireless charging standard compatibility, a rare feature in multi-port chargers of this class, enhancing its versatility.
Physically, the Anker 335 is compact, with a moderate height of 2.83 inches and a sleek width of 1.69 inches, lending it an advantage in cramped spaces such as tight power strips or bag compartments. Though slightly heavier (0.31875 lbs), it maintains excellent heat resistance and high thermal management efficiency, keeping device temperatures stable and charging safe without specifying thermal throttling. For budget-conscious users, the Anker 335's price point starting near $29.99 at Amazon.com makes it an economical yet powerful pick.
Next-Gen Efficiency and Durability Embodied in Anker 735 Nano 2
On the other side, the Anker 735 Nano 2 distinguishes itself by embracing modern GaN (Gallium Nitride) technology. Despite delivering a slightly lower max output of 65W, this translates to remarkable energy efficiency and minimal heat generation, thanks to a very low input current of 1.8A. Its fixed power distribution approach simplifies charging configurations, which might appeal to users seeking straightforward, reliable power delivery without manual adjustments.
The Anker 735 offers a well-defined charging voltage of 20V, promising stable compatibility with sensitive equipment. Its build quality incorporates a durable plastic and polycarbonate blend, rated with a drop resistance level of 3, an upgrade that enhances longevity, especially for mobile users prone to knocks and bumps.
At just 1.8 inches tall and weighing 0.31 lbs, the 735 Nano 2 is physically shorter, though wider than its counterpart, accommodating diverse packing preferences. Its detailed thermal management includes a specified thermal throttling threshold of 176°F and instant protection response time, underscoring its commitment to safe charging. Priced around $39.99 at amazon.com, it targets users willing to invest in advanced technology and rugged reliability.
Quick Take
The Anker 335 shines with higher wattage, adaptive charging power distribution, and Qi wireless charge compatibility at a budget-friendly price, making it a versatile and wallet-conscious choice. Meanwhile, the Anker 735 Nano 2 is your go-to if you prioritize energy-efficient GaN technology, enhanced durability with drop resistance, plus nuanced thermal controls that protect your devices under stress.
Bottom Line
For most beginners or casual users who want a reliable, flexible charger that won't break the bank, the Anker 335 remains the top recommendation due to its superior max power output and dynamic adaptability. However, if you seek a charger that leverages cutting-edge GaN efficiency and offers more rugged construction and safety features, the Anker 735 Nano 2 is worth the modest price premium.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 335 - Offers higher maximum power, dynamic charging distribution, and Qi wireless charging support, all at an attractive price point.
Runner-up: Anker 735 Nano 2 - Delivers enhanced energy efficiency with GaN technology, robust build quality, and advanced thermal protection, ideal for durability-focused users.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
This side-by-side chargers review of Anker 335 vs Anker 735 Nano 2 is packed with useful info — specs, standout features, and real user takes.
General Information
15
Intended Use
What is the intended use of this charger?
72
Anker 335
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger is intended for use in home, office, and travel environments, showing versatility across common charging scenarios.
Describes where and how the charger is primarily intended to be used.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
67
Anker 335
0Votes
AC Outlet
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
AC Outlet
Anker 735 Nano 2
Power is sourced directly from an AC outlet, the standard electrical supply found in homes and offices, ensuring broad compatibility and ease of use.
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
In the battle of Power Source,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Type
How is the charger installed?
37
Anker 335
0Votes
Plug-In
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plug-In
Anker 735 Nano 2
Installation type is plug-in, indicating easy setup by directly connecting to a power outlet without additional wiring or mounting requirements.
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Type on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
User Level
What user level is this charger designed for?
17
Anker 335
0Votes
Beginner
15
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Beginner
vs
User Level
For User Level, both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2 are designed for beginners, making them both suitable for entry-level users.
Describes the technical experience level required to use the charger effectively.
In the battle of User Level,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Level on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Certifications
What certifications does this charger have?
60
Anker 335
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
68
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
Anker 735 Nano 2
This charger holds several important certifications—including UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS—that demonstrate compliance with safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and environmental standards.
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Certifications on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Technology
What charging technology does it use?
27
Anker 335
0Votes
Standard Charging
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
1Votes
GaN
vs
Charging Technology
Anker 335 uses Standard Charging technology, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 uses GaN charging technology, which generally offers faster and more efficient charging.
Indicates the core technology used to deliver power efficiently.
In the battle of Charging Technology,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
58 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Charging Technology,
Anker 335 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
I like that the Anker 735 Nano 2 uses GaN charging technology which is more efficient than the standard tech on the Anker 335
See more
Product Name
What is the product name?
61
Anker 335
0Votes
Anker 335
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Anker 735
vs
Product Name
The Product Name for Anker 335 is 'Anker 335 ' while for Anker 735 Nano 2 it is 'Anker 735'. This difference helps identify the specific model each product represents.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Name on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
72
Anker 335
0Votes
Fast Charger
35
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Wall Charger
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
37 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charger Type on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 335 has an Input Current of 60A, significantly higher than the 1.8A input current of Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating differences in power input handling.
The amount of current drawn from the power source during operation.
In the battle of Input Current,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
58.2 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 335
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
20
Volt
0Votes
vs
Output Voltage
Anker 335 does not provide a specific Output Voltage value, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 offers 20 Volts, which could be important for certain device compatibilities.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
5
Watt
0Votes
5
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
The minimum output power is 5 Watts, suitable for reliably charging smaller devices or initiating charging processes with compatible equipment.
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power,
Anker 335 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
5.00 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Output Power on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
100
Volt
0Votes
100
Volt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Input voltage rating of 100 Volts corresponds to the voltage level the charger can safely accept from the power source.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
Anker 335 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
100.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
50
Hz
0Votes
50
Hz
0Votes
Anker 335
Input frequency is 50 Hz, suitable for electrical standards in many regions worldwide.
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
In the battle of Input Frequency,
Anker 335 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
equal
50.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Frequency on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Anker 735 Nano 2
The power factor is high, indicating efficient use of electrical power, reducing wasted energy and improving charger performance.
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Factor on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
0.2
Watt
0Votes
0.3
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
The standby power consumption is very low at 0.3 Watts, which helps reduce energy waste when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging a device.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Power Consumption,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
0.1 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Consumption on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation
How good is the voltage regulation?
67
Anker 335
0Votes
Good
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Excellent
Anker 735 Nano 2
Voltage regulation quality is excellent, ensuring stable voltage output to prevent damage to devices and maintain efficient charging.
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Short Circuit Protection
Does it have short circuit protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Short Circuit Protection
Both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2 include Short Circuit Protection, ensuring safety against electrical shorts.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Output Power
What is the maximum output power?
67
Watt
1Votes
65
Watt
0Votes
vs
Maximum Output Power
The Maximum Output Power of Anker 335 is 67W compared to 65W for Anker 735 Nano 2, offering a slightly higher power output in the 335.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power,
Anker 335 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Anker 335 uses a dynamic Power Distribution Method, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 uses a fixed method, which may affect how power is shared among devices.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
In the battle of Power Distribution Method,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
82 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Method on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Consistency is reported as consistent for both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating similar reliability during charging sessions.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Consistency on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Behavior
How does the charger throttle performance?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
Gradual
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Gradual
Anker 335
Throttling behavior is gradual, meaning charging speed reduces progressively to prevent overheating or damage.
Anker 735 Nano 2
Throttling behavior is gradual, meaning the charger reduces power output progressively under thermal or system stress, protecting components without abrupt interruptions.
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Behavior on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Charging Speed
What is the maximum charging speed?
67
Watt
0Votes
65
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Maximum charging speed is 65 Watts, enabling rapid charging for compatible high-power devices such as laptops and tablets.
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Charging Speed on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
37
Anker 335
0Votes
Stable
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger provides stable charging stability, ensuring consistent and reliable power flow to connected devices. Stable charging is crucial for prolonging device battery life and preventing unexpected power interruptions.
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Stability on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Management Efficiency
How efficient is heat management?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
vs
Heat Management Efficiency
Heat Management Efficiency for both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2 is rated as high, suggesting effective temperature control in both products.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Management Efficiency on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Charging Behavior
What happens after charging is complete?
67
Anker 335
0Votes
Standby
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Standby
vs
Idle Charging Behavior
Both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2 have an Idle Charging Behavior of standby mode, which can help in energy saving when not actively charging devices.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
18 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Charging Behavior on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
How many devices can be charged simultaneously?
27
Anker 335
0Votes
3 devices
0
Anker 735 Nano 2
1Votes
Yes
vs
Simultaneous Device Charging
Anker 335 supports charging 3 devices simultaneously, while Anker 735 Nano 2 simply states 'Yes' for simultaneous device charging, making Anker 335's exact capability clearer.
The maximum number of devices that can be charged at the same time.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
27 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Simultaneous Device Charging,
Anker 335 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
I appreciate that the 735 Nano 2 can charge multiple devices simultaneously with better power distribution control
See more
Charging Speed
What is the charging speed category?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
Ultra-Fast
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Ultra-Fast
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Speed on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intelligent Power Allocation on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Full Charge Time Estimate
How long does a full charge take?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 335
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
10
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Fast depending on device
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Full Charge Time Estimate on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Charging on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Detection Accuracy on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No
0Votes
Anker 335
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay,
Anker 335 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Startup Charging Delay on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2 are classified as compact for Travel Size Classification, easing portability for travel.
Overall size category based on dimensions and portability.
In the battle of Travel Size Classification,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Size Classification on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth of the charger?
1.26
inch
0Votes
1.15
inch
0Votes
Anker 335
Depth is 1.26 inch (3.20 cm), contributing to the charger’s compact profile.
The front-to-back measurement of the charger body.
In the battle of Depth,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
0.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Profile Depth
How far does the plug stick out?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 335
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3.5
inch
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Plug profile depth is 3.5 inches (8.9 centimeters), which impacts how much the charger extends from the wall outlet.
Depth of the plug profile when inserted into an outlet.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Profile Depth on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
The Housing Material for Anker 335 is plastic, whereas Anker 735 Nano 2 combines plastic and polycarbonate, possibly indicating different build durability.
Primary material used for the outer charger casing.
In the battle of Housing Material,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Housing Material on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 335
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
3
ft
0Votes
vs
Drop Resistance
Drop Resistance detail is unavailable for Anker 335, but Anker 735 Nano 2 offers resistance up to 3 feet, suggesting better shock protection in the 735 Nano 2.
Maximum drop height the charger can withstand without damage.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Material Sustainability Level is medium for both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating comparable environmental considerations in materials used.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Sustainability Level on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
V-0
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
V-0
Anker 335
Fire-retardant rating is V-0, the highest class, indicating excellent resistance to catching fire and enhanced safety.
Anker 735 Nano 2
Fire-retardant rating is V-0, the highest UL 94 standard, indicating materials used resist burning and self-extinguish quickly if ignited, enhancing user safety.
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
In the battle of Fire-Retardant Rating,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire-Retardant Rating on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Material
What material is the plug made of?
37
Anker 335
0Votes
Plastic
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plastic, Metal
Anker 335
The plug material is plastic, which is typical for ensuring insulation and cost-effective durability.
Material used for the plug prongs and structure.
In the battle of Plug Material,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Material on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
67
Anker 335
0Votes
Matte
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Matte
Anker 335
Surface finish is matte, which helps reduce fingerprints and glare for better aesthetics and grip.
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
42 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Finish on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
Solid
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Solid
Anker 335
Build rigidity is solid, meaning the charger has a robust construction that resists bending or warping.
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Rigidity on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
Reinforced
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Reinforced
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Heat-Resistant Materials
Does it use heat-resistant materials?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Heat-Resistant Materials
Both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2 use heat-resistant materials, improving safety and durability under high temperatures.
Uses materials designed to withstand high temperatures safely.
In the battle of Heat-Resistant Materials,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat-Resistant Materials on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch Resistance
How scratch-resistant is it?
47
Anker 335
0Votes
Medium
35
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Medium
vs
Scratch Resistance
Scratch Resistance is rated medium for both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, so they have similar surface durability against scratches.
Resistance of the surface to scratches and abrasions.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Scratch Resistance on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it resistant to moisture?
0
Anker 335
0Votes
None
0
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
Ability to withstand moisture exposure.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
Anker 335 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode exists in both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, providing automatic thermal protection.
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
In the battle of Thermal Fail-Safe Mode,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fault Detection
Can it detect electrical faults?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Anker 335
Fault detection is implemented to identify issues promptly, preventing potential device damage or malfunction.
Detects abnormal electrical conditions during operation.
In the battle of Fault Detection,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fault Detection on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Automatically reduces or shuts off power when excessive heat is detected.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature actively monitored?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Continuously monitors internal temperature during operation.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Electrical Isolation
Is electrical isolation implemented?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Separates high-voltage and low-voltage components for safety.
In the battle of Electrical Isolation,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrical Isolation on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Grounding
Does it support grounding?
No
0Votes
Anker 335
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Supports grounding to reduce shock and electrical interference.
In the battle of Grounding,
Anker 335 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grounding on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Child Safety Shutter
Is there a child safety shutter?
No
0Votes
Anker 335
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Child Safety Shutter
Neither Anker 335 nor Anker 735 Nano 2 include a Child Safety Shutter, which may be a consideration for households with children.
Prevents accidental insertion of objects into live ports.
In the battle of Child Safety Shutter,
Anker 335 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Safety Shutter on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Spark Protection
Does it have anti-spark protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Reduces sparking when plugging or unplugging devices.
In the battle of Anti-Spark Protection,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Anti-Spark Protection on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
EMI Protection
Is EMI protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Protects against electromagnetic interference affecting nearby electronics.
In the battle of EMI Protection,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EMI Protection on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
ESD Protection
Is ESD protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Shields the charger from electrostatic discharge damage.
In the battle of ESD Protection,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ESD Protection on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it shut off automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Automatically cuts power when unsafe conditions are detected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification Level
What is the safety certification level?
67
Anker 335
0Votes
Enhanced
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Premium
Overall strength of safety certifications achieved.
In the battle of Safety Certification Level,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification Level on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Cross-Brand Compatibility is universal for both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, allowing use with multiple device brands.
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cross-Brand Compatibility on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Does it support Quick Charge?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Anker 335
Quick Charge support is enabled, allowing the charger to charge compatible devices faster than standard rates.
Indicates compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge technology.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging Standard
Which wireless charging standard is supported?
71
Anker 335
0Votes
Qi
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Wireless Charging Standard
Wireless Charging Standard is Qi for Anker 335 but unavailable for Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating only Anker 335 references a wireless charging protocol.
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Standard on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery standard for fast and flexible charging.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
PPS
Does it support PPS?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Supports Programmable Power Supply for efficient fast charging.
In the battle of PPS,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
PPS on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Optimized compatibility with Apple devices and charging requirements.
In the battle of Apple Charging,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Android Charging
Is it compatible with Android devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Ensures compatibility with Android devices and charging protocols.
In the battle of Android Charging,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Android Charging on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Tablet Charging
Does it support tablet charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Tablet Charging
Tablet Charging is supported by both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, confirming compatibility with tablet devices.
Indicates compatibility with tablets and similar devices.
In the battle of Tablet Charging,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tablet Charging on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Charging
Can it charge wearables?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Supports charging of wearables like smartwatches or earbuds.
In the battle of Wearable Charging,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Charging on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Backward Compatibility
Is it backward compatible?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Backward Compatibility
Both offer Backward Compatibility, supporting older device standards equally.
Maintains compatibility with older charging standards and devices.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Proprietary Protocol,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proprietary Protocol on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal & Environmental Performance
11
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
37
Anker 335
0Votes
Heat Sink
65
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Heat Sink
Anker 335
Internal cooling design uses a heat sink to dissipate heat efficiently during charging, improving reliability and safety.
Anker 735 Nano 2
Internal cooling is managed by a heat sink, a passive cooling component that absorbs and disperses heat generated during charging to prolong charger lifespan.
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Cooling Design on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 335
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
76
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
-4–140°F
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger can operate within a storage temperature range of -4–140°F (-20–60°C). This wide range facilitates safe storage in diverse environmental conditions without degradation.
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
27
Anker 335
0Votes
Passive
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Passive
vs
Thermal Dissipation Method
Thermal Dissipation Method is passive for both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, relying on non-active cooling techniques.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Dissipation Method on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Anker 335
Fanless design reduces noise and maintenance, enhancing user comfort and reliability in quiet environments.
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
In the battle of Fanless Design,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fanless Design on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Anker 735 Nano 2
High ambient temperature tolerance means the charger can reliably function in warmer environments without risk of overheating or performance degradation.
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ambient Temperature Tolerance on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 335
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
5
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Up to 10,000 ft
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger is designed to operate at altitudes up to 10,000 ft (3048 meters), which is beneficial for use in high-altitude locations without performance loss.
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Altitude Operating Range on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Throttling Threshold
At what temperature does throttling occur?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 335
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
176
°F
1Votes
vs
Thermal Throttling Threshold
Thermal Throttling Threshold is unavailable for Anker 335 and set at 176°F for Anker 735 Nano 2, providing a specific thermal limit only for the 735 Nano 2.
Temperature at which charging power is reduced to prevent overheating.
Based on community votes for Thermal Throttling Threshold,
Anker 335 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Thermal throttling threshold on the 735 Nano 2 is clearly better at 176°F while the 335 does not list this spec
See more
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 335
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
56
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
32–104°F
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Noise Level
How noisy is the charger?
0
dB
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Noise Level
Noise Level is 0 dB for Anker 335 meaning silent operation, whereas it's unavailable for Anker 735 Nano 2, so noise performance there is unknown.
Operational noise produced during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Noise Level on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Loss as Heat
How much energy is lost as heat?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 335
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
vs
Energy Loss as Heat
Energy Loss as Heat is not available for Anker 335 but rated low for Anker 735 Nano 2, suggesting better thermal efficiency in the latter.
Percentage of input energy lost as heat during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Loss as Heat on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Sustained Load Temperature Stability
How stable is temperature under sustained load?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
Stable
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
vs
Sustained Load Temperature Stability
Sustained Load Temperature Stability is stable for both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, indicating reliable performance under prolonged use.
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustained Load Temperature Stability on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Neither Anker 335 nor Anker 735 Nano 2 have LED Indicators, reducing visual usage feedback features.
Presence of LED lights to show charging or power status.
In the battle of LED Indicators,
Anker 335 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicators on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Plug
Does it have a foldable plug?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Anker 735 Nano 2
A foldable plug is featured, making the charger more compact and easier to transport. This design is convenient for travel, reducing the risk of damaging the plug during storage.
Indicates whether the plug can fold for easier storage and travel.
In the battle of Foldable Plug,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Plug on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Friendly
Is it travel-friendly?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Travel Friendly
Both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2 are travel friendly, supporting use for users who need portable charging solutions.
Designed for easy transport and use while traveling.
In the battle of Travel Friendly,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Friendly on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Management
How is the cable managed?
22
Anker 335
0Votes
External
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
External
vs
Cable Management
Cable Management is external for both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, showing they rely on external solutions for cable tidiness.
How the charging cable is managed when not in use.
In the battle of Cable Management,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
33 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Management on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Behavior
How do the indicators behave?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 335
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How indicator lights behave during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Behavior on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Method
How does it provide user feedback?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 335
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Methods used to communicate status to the user.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Method on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
One-Hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Allows easy plugging and unplugging with one hand.
In the battle of One-Hand Operation,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-Hand Operation on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Setup Complexity
How complex is setup?
87
Anker 335
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
Effort required to start using the charger.
In the battle of Setup Complexity,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Setup Complexity on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Requirements
Does it require maintenance?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
None
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
Level of maintenance needed to keep the charger functioning well.
In the battle of Maintenance Requirements,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maintenance Requirements on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Daily Use Convenience
How convenient is it for daily use?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
vs
Daily Use Convenience
Daily Use Convenience is high for both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, suggesting they are practical for everyday charging needs.
Overall convenience during everyday use.
In the battle of Daily Use Convenience,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daily Use Convenience on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No
0Votes
Anker 335
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Indicates whether the charger firmware can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
Anker 335 ◉ is
same as
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Mean Time Between Failures is high for both products, reflecting strong reliability in Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2.
Average reliability level indicating how often failures are expected.
In the battle of Mean Time Between Failures,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mean Time Between Failures on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Stress Resistance is medium for both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, reflecting similar resilience to environmental factors.
Ability to withstand heat, humidity, and other stresses.
In the battle of Environmental Stress Resistance,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Stress Resistance on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Both have a premium manufacturing quality but the 735 Nano 2 seems a little more reliable with the same high MTBF
See more
Long-Term Stability
How stable is long-term performance?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
Stable
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
Anker 735 Nano 2
Long-term stability refers to the charger’s ability to maintain consistent performance over extended periods without failure or efficiency loss.
Performance consistency over extended use periods.
In the battle of Long-Term Stability,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Long-Term Stability on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Reliability Certification
Is reliability certified?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 335
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Anker 335
The product has reliability certification, ensuring it meets standards for safe and reliable operation.
Indicates whether reliability has been independently certified.
In the battle of Reliability Certification,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Reliability Certification on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Insertion Cycles
How durable is the plug connection over time?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
In the battle of Plug Insertion Cycles,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Insertion Cycles on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Port Wear Resistance
How resistant are the ports to wear?
97
Anker 335
0Votes
High
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
Resistance of charging ports to wear over time.
In the battle of Port Wear Resistance,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Wear Resistance on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Carbon Footprint Category is medium for both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, reflecting average environmental impact from manufacturing and use.
Estimated environmental impact from production and use.
In the battle of Carbon Footprint Category,
Anker 335 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
lower
8 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carbon Footprint Category on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Customer Support Availability is during Business Hours for both Anker 335 and Anker 735 Nano 2, meaning support is accessible during standard working times.
Availability of customer support services.
In the battle of Customer Support Availability,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customer Support Availability on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Length is '1,5 Years' for Anker 335 and '1,5 Year' for Anker 735 Nano 2, both offering similar warranty durations providing consumer assurance.
Duration of warranty coverage provided with the charger.
In the battle of Warranty Length,
Anker 335 ◉ is
better than
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
, delivering
higher
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Length on Anker 335 ◉
vs Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ and help others decide!
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
